
I would suggest that these two aspects of bitachon are not contradictory. For example, in R. Bachya (ben Asher)'s explicit source, R. Yonah's commentary to Prov. 3:6, R. Yonah writes that bitachon is an incredibly rewarding attitude that brings you closer to God. He does not, however, state that what you hope for will not come true. That was R. Bachya (ben Asher)'s innovation. R. Yonah seems to hold of both a bitachon of faith and of love.
Similarly, Orechos Tzadikim (Sha'ar Ha-Simcha) begins his discussion of bitachon with a quote from R. Shlomo ibn Gabirol's Mivchar Ha-Peninim (according to a footnote in the Lipkin edition) which clearly expresses a bitachon of love. He then proceeds with a quote from Chovos Ha-Levavos which includes the need to rely on God's mercy to grant good even to those who do not deserve it -- clearly an expression of a bitachon of faith.
It is R. Bachya's separation of faith from love that is useful in the context of Interventionism, the view that the world follows the laws of nature but God sometimes intervenes (see this post: link; and R. Bachya's commentary to Gen. 18:19). A bitachon of faith could be Interventionist. It could mean that you must trust that God will intervene on your behalf. It could, however, reflect a belief that God controls everything and there are no real laws of nature.R. Bachya's view, however, it exclusively Interventionist. He diverges from the approach of R. Yonah and the Orechos Tzadikim that combines faith and love, retaining only the aspect of love -- you must place your fate in God's hands, thereby growing closer to Him.