Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Rosh Hashana - Sour, Bitter, & Sharp Foods

By: Rabbi Ari Enkin

The Talmud teaches that one should eat symbolic and meaningful foods on Rosh Hashana, as "omens are significant [and have influence]…on the entire year".[1] For example, there is a universal custom to begin the Rosh Hashana meal with an apple dipped in honey in order to symbolize our hope for a sweet new year. Eating sweet foods is said to be able to influence God in "sweetening" our judgment for the coming year. It is interesting to note that the apple evolved as the primary symbolic food of Rosh Hashana because an apple orchard represents “a field blessed by God”[2] and is also symbolic of paradise.[3] There are many other foods as well which have evolved throughout the ages which are customary to eat on Rosh Hashana as a segula for a good year.

Click here for moreIn contrast, there is also a widespread custom to avoid eating sour or bitter foods, in order not to arouse any "bitter" influences for the coming year. It seems that the custom to refrain from such foods evolved in the era of the Gaonim, circa 600-1000 c.e. According to the custom,"…we don’t cook dishes that are sour [sheyesh bo chometz]…we only eat sweet things…so that the entire year will be sweet and pleasant with nothing bad nor any stress".[4] It is noted that the only foods cited in the original enactment to avoid on Rosh Hashana are "sour" ones – there is no mention or ban on "sharp" (charif) or "bitter" (mar) foods. Indeed, the primary contemporary halachic authorities only cite the practice of avoiding "sour" foods on Rosh Hashana.[5]

Nevertheless, there are later authorities who have incorporated "bitter" foods in the custom, as well.[6] That being said, however, there is no restriction on adding "pepper" and other sharp spices which are needed to enhance the flavour of the food.[7] As such, although one is well advised to avoid "sour" and maybe even "bitter" foods in compliance with the custom, there does not seem to be any need to avoid "sharp" foods.[8]

It is also worth mentioning that the original custom of avoiding sour (and later, bitter) foods may have only been intended to apply on the first night of Rosh Hashana and not the second one.[9] In some communities the custom is to avoid all such sour, bitter, or sharp foods for the entire aseret yemei teshuva, from Rosh Hashana until after Yom Kippur,[10] and some even do so until after Simchat Torah.[11]

Nevertheless, common custom is not like this view and most people only observe the injunction on the first night(s) of Rosh Hashana. Additionally, it seems that virtually all halachic authorities sanction eating "sharp" foods on Rosh Hashana, especially when it is merely being added to a dish as a spice. It is also argued that even those who suggest avoiding "sharp" foods on Rosh Hashana were not referring to sharp foods in the way we understand the term. Rather, "sharp" in the Middle Ages was also used as a word to describe something exceptionally "bitter".[12]


**********************************

[1] Keritut 6a
[2] Tur and others, Bereishit 27:27.
[3] Zohar, Bereishit 27:27; cf. "Chakal Tapuchin Kadishin".
[4] Kaf Hachaim 583:19
[5] Mishna Berura 583:5, Shulchan Aruch Harav 583:3
[6] Mateh Ephraim 583:3, Aruch Hashulchan 583:3
[7] Aruch Hashulchan O.C. 583:3
[8] Birurei Chaim 4:20
[9] Aruch Hashulchan O.C. 583:3
[10] Leket Yosher p.124, cited in Birurei Chaim 4:20
[11] Piskei Teshuvot 583:5
[12] Birurei Chaim 4:20


Monday, September 14, 2009

Me on JM in the AM

UPDATE: You can listen to the discussion on Nachum Segal's website: link (it's loading slowly today but be patient and you'll get there)

Listen to me tomorrow on Monday morning, September 13th at 7:30 am talking with Nachum Segal on the popular JM in the AM program to discuss my new book.

Listen to it on:

91.1fm in NY/NJ
90.1fm in the Catskills
www.NachumSegal.com


Sunday, September 13, 2009

Early Selichos

The custom of reciting selichos between Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur dates back at least to Geonic times, and during the month of Elul to Medieval Spain. We still recite selichos like this centuries-old practice but we generally do not say them at the traditional time.

It is clear from the wording of the sources that the custom is to recite selichos right before dawn (i.e. at the end of the night) and then begin praying immediately after dawn. That is what the Rambam (Mishneh Torah, Hilkhos Teshuvah 3:4) and the Shulchan Arukh (Orach Chaim 581:1) imply.

Click here for moreThe general practice I've seen is to recite them approximately half an hour before morning services, whenever they are (usually well after dawn), except for the first night when we say selichos at 1am (midnight adjusted for Daylight Savings Times). In yeshiva, though, we would always say selichos at 1am. Neither of these two practices matches the ancient practice.

There is a third practice somewhat prevalent -- to recite selichos at 9 or 10pm the night before. This is somewhat controversial because the Magen Avraham (565:5) writes that according to Kabbalah, it is bad to recite selichos before midnight. Based on this Magen Avraham, the posekim roundly condemn this practice of early selichos. R. Nachum Rabinovitch (Melumedei Milchamah, no. 90) even recommends, in an emergency situation, saying just one quick selichah (more, if possible) before morning prayers rather than early selichos. The most lenient is R. Moshe Feinstein (Iggeros Moshe, Orach Chaim vol. 2 no. 105) who allows it as an emergency practice if people are scared to go out late at night or early in the morning, or if otherwise there would be no selichos. Hardly a ringing endorsement.

I have to say, though, that I am a little puzzled by the stringency on this point. Is it really such a big deal? This is a kabbalistic prohibition that we don't understand and the non-kabbalists/non-Sephardim usually set aside such issues when there is a need, particularly when there is an established custom. Early selichos have been around for at least 150 years (cf. Matteh Ephraim 581:20 - link, first published posthumously in 1834 by a rabbi who died in 1828), probably longer. Do we really have to be so strict about this?

I suspect that one of the concerns that leads to strictness is that early selichos is largely a matter of convenience and laziness. Rather than stay up late or wake up early, people want a convenient alternative. While neither midnight (1am) nor early morning selichos are the original custom, they aren't easy outs like the early night selichos are. That, perhaps, mitigates the ease with which we would set aside a kabbalistic prohibition.


Thursday, September 10, 2009

Audio Roundup LVIII

by Joel Rich

Question - On another blog the poster gushed as to of how all of creation testifies to HKB"H as creator. While I subscribe to this as a matter of belief, does this line of reasoning convince analytical folks who are not yet believers?

  • Rabbi Binyamin Levine - How Rav Aryeh Levine Prepared for Rosh Hashana/YK: link

    A must listen! He repeats the lessons that Avi Mori Vrabbi Zll”hh tried to inscribe on my soul. R’Aryeh Levin of Jerusalem (his grandfather) taught him the very simple lessons of how to relate to other people (great story of R’Y Salanter and the quick Friday night meal at a student’s home – so the housekeeper could get to sleep).
    Rails against “the gedolim who knew all of shas by age 2” stories – why can’t they tell the truth (e.g. R’SZA was menachem avel to women and also said mazel tov to them at their smachot).
    Yiddishkeit means being normal! We think we need to verbally give others mussar, really need to be examples of what mussar results in – many times more effective.

  • Click here for more
  • Rav Reuven Feinstein - Inyanei Teshuva: link

    Nice thoughts on repentance given IIUC at YU – would be notable in any event as per Samuel Johnson on a woman’s preaching J.

  • Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz - Why Don't Ashkenazic Jews Do Birchas Kohanim Every Day in Chutz La'aretz: link

    Why don’t we (bnai ashkenaz) do it daily? A lot of reasons given that translate IMHO into “we don’t because they (before us) didn’t, even if we don’t know why. We don’t restart because of the GRA and R’Chaim tried to and bad things happened. [me – if it’s chazaka then why didn’t GRA try again? And how did he know it was a bad omen and not the sitra achra?]

  • Rabbi Yonason Sacks - Milchemes Reshus vs. Milchemes Mitzva, What was the Issur of Eishes Yefas To'ar?: link

    Technical discussion of Yfat Toar (war concubine?) – including milchemet mitzvah (required war) vs. rshut (permitted), geirut (convert) , hutrah vs. dchuya (undone vs. set aside).

  • Rabbi Michael Taubes - Lashon Hara, Two Types and its Sources: link

    Analysis of mitzvah of “vinishmartem mikol davar ra” in the context of lashon hara.

  • Rabbi Elli Fischer - Nehemiah Chapter 1: link 1, link 2, link 3, link 4

    1. written in first person – prayer for success
    2. asks to go to Yerushalayim
    3. build walls, everyone does their part
    4. Set up defense (work & defend)

  • Dr. Shnayer Leiman - Reciting L'Dovid Hashem Ori, A Secret History: link

    L’david hashem – history – no real early sources – Some interesting Chassidic intrigue.

  • Rabbi Jeremy Wieder - Choshen Mishpat Siman Aleph 01: link

    Good quick summary introduction to shulchan aruch and choshen mishpat. Shouldn’t learn S”A without tur and bet yosef. Discussion of how dayanim function without a real smicha (and in what cases they have authority). [me – the whole issue of trans-generational authorization {shlichitayhu} is interesting, much like minhag avoteinu – how is an earlier generation authorized to bind a later one???]

  • Rabbi Etan Moshe Berman - Jewish Legal Values and Concepts: Introduction: link

    Yaakov Avinu and the pachim ktanim (small vessels) that he went back for – complete honesty and appreciation of resources granted us is hallmark of our approach.

  • Rabbi Eliakim Koenigsberg - Halachos of Selichos and Erev Rosh Hashana: link

    Tshuva (repentance) as seen by the Rambam, Rabbeinu Yonah and the Maharil. R’YBS on acquittal vs. purification as well as the need for repentance from a culture of sin in addition to individual sin.

  • Rav Moshe Taragin - Tefilot of Yamim Noraim #01 - Selichot: link

    3 Voices of Tshuva in slichot
    1. 13 attributes – HKB”H taught this prayer – it’s almost vicarious repentance.
    2. Psychological/existential – deeper recognition of sin and need to change
    3. Historical suffering

  • Rabbi Hershel Schachter -Sefer Hamitzvos Part 1: link

    Sefer Hamitzvot of Rambam was introduction to Yad Hachazaka. It was severed by printers but must learn both together to understand both. Discussion here includes smicha & yiddush hachodesh. Note: Organizing principle of sefer is not clear (me – wow – the Rambam???).

  • Rabbi Hershel Schachter -Sefer Hamitzvos Part 2: link

    Focus on whether paired mitzvot are able to inhibit each other.

  • Dr. Michelle J. Levine - Walking in the Paths of Ba'alei Teshuva Throughout Tanakh: link

    Biblical models of repentance including Adam, Kayin, Yonah, David… Interesting thought on “Kol haoemer David Chatah eino elah toeh” (anyone who says David sinned is in error) as meaning don’t focus on his sin, focus on his repentance (me – not pshat, but then again IIRC the statement is a single individual’s opinion).

  • Rabbi Eliakim Koenigsberg - Halachos of Selichos and Erev Rosh Hashana: link

    Detailed discussion on slichot, including R’YBS on the nature of slichot as reflected in the priority given to the leader to lead all the other prayers of the day. Mikveh in the AM discussed as well. Not sleeping on Rosh Hashana (money quote – “it’s not the worst thing”). Discussion of Brit Mila on Rosh Hashana as well as eating before tkiot.

  • Rabbi Kenneth Brander - Finding the Joy in the Days of Awe: link

    Case where R’Yosef Karo paskined against the heavenly being he learned with (GRA refused to learn with heavenly being). [me – so if he went with “rational” why did he learn with the being in the first place?]
    Yom Kippur has element of joy – we set our souls to sing by retreating from the physical world and having the quintessential Shabbat experience.
    Celebration of our relationship with HKB”H through oral torah given with second luchot on Yom Kippur. [A lchatchila bdeieved? (i.e. we would’ve been better off without oral law but what can you do?)]

  • Rabbi Michael Rosensweig - Kedushas Beis Hamedrash U'Beis Hakneses: link

    Insights on halachic do’s and don’ts in a beit knesset vs. beit medrash and the hashkafic implications of a beit medrash being a bei rabannan (house of Rabbi’s?).

  • Rav Yair Kahn - Hilchot Teshuva #01: link

    R’E Wasserman on whether Tshuva is midat hadin (justice) or rarhamim (mercy). R’ Kahn says since HKB”H created frail man, then it’s din (justice) that he must allow tshuva (repentance = mercy) to work.

  • Rabbi Zvi Sobolofsky - Kibud Av V'Em: link

    When do you have to listen to your parents? (note: sometimes even if it’s not the mitzvah of Kavod Av V’eim it may be the flip side of the prohibition of not being stupid).
    Cases discussed:
    Black hat
    Aliyah (to Eretz Yisrael – not Teaneck)
    Marriage
    Question: Why did the Maharik need three reasons to explain why marriage was not covered?

  • Rabbi Ally Ehrman - Ma Yomru HaGoyim - Just Good PR?: link

    Fulfilling HKB”H’s will is kavod and vice versa. It’s in a way more kaved if initially didn’t listen then did later. This is part of message of “what will the non-baalei Brit say “ in the ultimate redemption. Some Kabbala as well (BTW, I missed Madonna's singing lcha dodi!)

  • Rabbi Baruch Simon - Ki Seitze 5769 - Chizuk for the Beginning of the New Zman: link

    Shem M’shmuel – Yfat toar, ben ahuva and ben sorer teaches the importance of getting off to a good start.

  • The Illiteracy Epidemic: Follow-Up

    You might recall an opinion piece last February by Dr. Shawn Zelig Aster about the problems he found teaching Bible in Yeshiva University of some students having difficulty reading and understanding Hebrew (link). R. Shalom Z. Berger wrote a guest post on this blog in response to Dr. Aster (link). Dr. Aster has since taught a remedial course in Hebrew literacy and developed an entire program to deal with the problem. His write-up can found here in PDF (link). It can also be found in the archives of the LookJed e-mail list of Jewish educators, followed by an interesting discussion of educators, many of whom disagree with Dr. Aster's approach (link).

    A number of the objections include fond recollections of "Ivrit Be-Ivrit" (teaching Jewish subjects in Hebrew - Modern Hebrew transliteration intentional). I wonder, though, whether the teaching of Hebrew language skills was at the expense of religious inspiration (what educators call "affective"). Was the drop-out rate from religious observance significantly higher then? I think so. Maybe if less time had been spent on Hebrew language skills and more on religious inspiration, like we do now, more people would have remained in the fold.


    Wednesday, September 09, 2009

    Parashah Roundup: Nitzavim-Vayeileikh 5769

    by Steve Brizel

    The Inner State of Man
  • R Ezra Bick, based upon the comments of Netziv, explains how Parshas Nitzavim and the two following Parshiyos deal with reinforcing our commitment to Torah: link

  • The Individual and The Community
  • R Baruch Simon illustrates how the opening words prove how every Jew should relate to every other and that we must emulate Moshe Rabbeinu's actions by showing by example. Jew: link 1 (audio), link 2 (audio)

  • The Chopper of Wood and the Drawers of Water
  • R Shlomoh Riskin,based on a Midrashic explanation, exhorts us to remember why Avraham Avinu and Eliyahu HaNavi,are critically important parts of every Bris Milah and Seder: link

  • Click here for moreThe Duality of Emotions
  • R Berel Wein illustrates the optimism and sadness in both of this week's Parshiyos: link

  • The Mitzvah of Teshuvah
  • R Yitzchak Etshalom explores the many dimensions of the Mitzvah of Teshuvah: link
  • R Reuven Feinstein discusses many aspects of Teshuvah: link (audio)
  • R Avigdor Nevenzal explains why the Geulah must be preceded by Teshuvah and why man's actions or inactions, proper or improper, determine how the world functions: link 1, link 2
  • R Baruch Simon offers many insights into the unique nature of the Mitzvah of Teshuvah: link 1 (audio), link 2 (audio)
  • R Yissocher Frand, based on an observation of R Chaim Brisker ZTL, and the comments of the Ramban and the Netziv, reminds us of the challenge of Teshuvah in our generation, and the ability of Teshuvah to effectuate a reunion between HaShem and His children: link
  • The Nesivos Shalom, as explicated by R Yitzchak Adlerstein, explains how to approach Rosh HaShanah so that we are judged as children of HaShem, as opposed to slaves: link
  • R Ephraim Buchwald discusses the relationship between the Mitzvah of Teshuvah and the Messianic Age: link
  • R Sir Jonathan Sacks explores how Rambam and Ramban view the elements of Scar VaOnesh in their understanding of the Mitzvah of Teshuvah: link
  • R Zvi Sobolofsky explains that increasing our level of Torah study, in the absence of a Beis HaMikdash, enables us to get a glimpse of the Shechinah , enhance our Yiras Shamayim and properly experience the Yamim Noraim: link
  • R Asher Brander emphasizes the Divine Gift that underscores the essence of the Mitzvah of Teshuvah: link
  • R Dovid Horwitz offers an explanation into a famous comment of Resh Lakish in Yoma 86b on the transformative nature of Teshuvah: link
  • Dr. Michelle J. Levine leads us through the paths of Teshuvah taken by Biblical personalities: link (audio)

  • HaNistaros LaShem Elokeinu
  • R Mordechai Willig exhorts us to both make Torah and Mitzvos exciting and attractive while simultaneously being able to condemn sinful behavior and heretical doctrines: link
  • R Avraham Gordimer illustrates the differences between knowing HaShem's Divinely Revealed Torah and inscrutable principles that define how HaShem runs His World that are beyond human comprehension: link

  • The Mitzvah of Hakhel
  • R Avraham Gordimer explains why the Mitzvah of Hakhel was given in Parshas Vayelech as opposed to Parshas Behar or Parshas Shoftim: link

  • The Mitzva of Writing a Sefer Torah
  • R Dovid Gottlieb discusses the elements of writing a Sefer Torah: link (audio)

  • Shloshim Yom Kodem HaChag Department
  • Rav Soloveitchik ZTL, explicates the Avodas Yom HaKipurrim and Hashkafic aspects of Yom HaKipurrim: link (audio)
  • R Aharon Lichtenstein explores the sources in Chazal and Rishonim with respect to adding HaMelech HaKadosh and HaMelech and HaMishpat in the Tefilos between Rosh HaShanah and Yom Hkippurim: link
  • R Herschel Schachter reviews Halachos and Minhagim associated with the Nusach HaTefilos of the YamimNoraim, the Musaf of Rosh HaShanah, and Halachos related to Yom HaKippurim: link 1 (audio), link 2 (audio), link 3 (audio)
  • R Dovid Miller , based upon the Drasha of the Ramban for Rosh HaShanah, explores in a series of shiurim, many of the Hashkafic concepts in Tanach and Chazal that are a major theme of Rosh HaShanah: link (audio)
  • Rebbitzen Peshi Neuberger discusses Ldavid HaShem V”Ori: link (audio)
  • R Eytan Feiner discusses many halachos of Elul and Rosh HaHaShanah: link
  • R Yona Reiss explores Halachos and Minhagim related to Erev Rosh HaShanah: link (audio)
  • R Asher Weiss discusses the Mitzvah of Shofar and its Brachos: link (audio)
  • R Doniel Schreiber discusses the definition of the mitzvah of Shofar and the number of Shofar blasts one must hear to fulfil the mitzvah: link 1, link 2
  • R Elyakim Koenigsberg discusses the Seder Tekias Shofar: link (audio)
  • R Baruch Simon explores the Halachic fundamental of Yatza Motzie: link (audio)
  • R Yonasan Sacks discuses Rosh HaShanah that occurs on Shabbos: link (audio)
  • R Yonasan Sacks and R Aryeh Leibowitz discusses the Halachah of Simcha on Rosh HaShanah: link 1 (audio), link 2 (audio)
  • R Daniel Z. Feldman discusses the Halachic fundamental of Yesh Koach B'Yad Chachamim L'Akor Davar Min HaTorah Bshev Val Taaseh: link (audio)
  • R Joshua Flug discuses how to eat a new fruit on the second night of Rosh HaShanah and reviews the controversy over the Minhag of Kaparos: link 1, link 2 (audio)
  • Rebbitzen Smadar Rosensweig demonstrates how Teshuvah and Taharah are the prime themes of the Haftarah of Shabbos Shuvah: link (audio)
  • R Dovid Gottlieb reviews the relationship between Vidui and Teshuvah: link (audio)
  • R Ozer Glickman warns us not to divorce Halacha from the Divine Experience: link (PDF)
  • R Yonasan Sacks contrasts Kaparah and Taharah: link (audio)
  • R Mordechai Willig discusses the Halachah of Choleh BaYom HaKippurim: link (audio)
  • R Dovid Miller discusses Hilcos Yom HaKippurim, Sukkos and Yom Tom Sheni: link (audio)

  • Last year's roundup: link 1, link 2.


    Reform Da'as Torah

    When you think of Reform responsa, you automatically think of Reform Rabbi Solomon Freehof, who published some eight volumes of responsa (on Freehof, see the article in Wikipedia - link - and listen to the lecture by R. Adam Mintz - link). Now there is another name that will be added to the short list of Reform responsa authors. Baruch J. Cohon recently published his father Reform Rabbi Samuel S. Cohon's rabbinic correspondence from 1917-1957 under the title Faithfully Yours, along with the son's comments about the significance of various letters.

    Cohon was a longtime professor of Jewish Theology at Hebrew Union College and taught generations of Reform Rabbis. When these rabbis went out into the field, they often contacted their professor with questions of both theology and practice. This was at a time when Reform Judaism was developing in America and Prof. Cohon played a significant role in the changes.

    The book is fascinating for many reasons.

    Click here for more
    The book is fascinating for many reasons. For one thing, there are a large number of theological issues addressed, to rabbis, educators, laypeople and Christian clergy. Cohon responded, sometimes briefly but often with detailed citation of relevant passages in rabbinic and occasionally Christian literature (there is one letter where he corrects a minister's understanding of the Christian Bible). Some questions are very complex and others are exceedingly simple. Sometimes people asked for Cohon's opinion on curricula and other times about proofs for the existence of God (he accepts the argument from design). Surprisingly, the most frequent theological question he seems to address is that of the afterlife. Questioner after questioner asked about it. Cohon was a specialist in theology and was able to answer all of these questions expertly (although I found a scathing critique of one of Cohon's theological works by Emil Fackenheim in a Sep. 1949 issue of Commentary magazine - link).

    The other most frequent issue addressed in the book is that of intermarriage. How to deal with it in terms of synagogue membership, children from a mixed marriage, and conversion procedures resulting from an intermarriage just abound throughout the book. It is a sad expression of the times in which Cohon lived, which has only gotten worse today. This leads to what is really the most fascinating part of the book, an appendix consisting of letters from a college-age female with whom Cohon corresponded. She had heard him speak about Judaism on her college campus and wished to discuss the religion with him. The daughter of a Jewish mother and Christian father in rural Kentucky, she describes the cultural and religious environment in which she was raised and her own conflicted religious growth.

    The letters in this book are significantly different from Freehof's. On issues of religious practice, Freehof would quote traditional authorities (such as the Chasam Sofer) to establish Jewish law and then discuss whether he feels bound by it. Cohon, instead, turns to Talmudic and Biblical sources, including historical literature, and draws conclusion directly from them, generally bypassing 1500 years of Jewish legal development. Although when giving advice on standard religious procedures, he often refers to the at-the-time recent codex Otzar Dinim U-Minhagim by J.D. Eisenstein.

    Sometimes he decides to follow the laws he describes (e.g. not allowing a wedding on Friday night after sunset) and sometimes not (e.g. selling war bonds on Shabbos, allowing an intermarriage for a soldier going out to war if the woman promises to convert afterward). Generally, what I find in the letters is someone who has a strong belief in God and Jewish theology, is concerned with maintaining a strong Jewish community, and likes Jewish tradition. But because he does not consider Jewish law binding, he is willing to make exceptions when necessary.

    That is exactly what I would expect from someone who does not feel an obligation to maintain Jewish law and just does it out of desire. When push comes to shove, Jewish law has to bend. However, Cohon will not let it bend when he thinks it is a bad idea, like moving the Sabbath to Sunday or performing a mixed marriage. He seems to evaluate every issue based on his personal judgment and, despite his consultation with Jewish tradition, uses that judgment as the main arbiter of whether to permit or forbid a practice. He expects his authority as a rabbi to convince people who do not find Jewish law binding to accept his decisions. Call it Reform Da'as Torah. Based on what I see today in the Reform community, I don't think it was a successful approach.

    The book is long -- 400 pages, sadly without an index but with a detailed table of contents. There are many different sections. I think it is worth noting that there is a 25-page response by Prof. Cohon to accusations against the Talmud. In general, the book is mainly of historical interest but if American Jewish history appeals to you, this book is fascinating.


    Authentic Judaism

    On the advice of rabbinic counsel, and against my own judgment, I have taken down my post from the other day attempting to manipulate search results and will no longer engage in such attempts. Thank you for those who assisted. I apologize for involving you in the effort.


    Tuesday, September 08, 2009

    Teaching and Ruling

    There is a bit of a contradiction, or at least an apparent inconsistency, in R. Abraham Besdin's book Reflections of the Rav. In chapter 6 ("The Profundity of Jewish Folk Wisdom"), R. Besdin quotes R. Joseph B. Soloveitchik as defending the religious intuition of the devout but unlearned Jew. The values and traditions are so ingrained in the Jewish psyche that they infiltrate the subconscious thought of such Jews.

    Yet in chapter 13 ("The 'Common-Sense' Rebellion Against Torah Authority"), R. Besdin quotes R. Soloveitchik as insisting that authentic Judaism must come from its authoritative representatives because the masses are misguided in their "common-sense" approach. Are the masses subconsciously enlightened or not? Can their religious instincts be trusted or not?

    I think the resolution to this question can be found in the repetition in chapter 1 of Avos of the dictum: "Make for yourself a teacher" (Avos 1:6, 16).

    Click here for more
    I think the resolution to this question can be found in the repetition in chapter 1 of Avos of the dictum: "Make for yourself a teacher" (Avos 1:6, 16). According to Rashi, this is an example of two rabbis teaching the same idea. The Rambam, however, sees two different concepts being advocated.

    The first is an instruction to find a mentor who will teach you Torah. The second is a command to find a rabbinic authority who will rule on halakhic matters for you. The former is about a teacher of Torah theory and the latter about an instructor in Torah practice.

    When it comes to Torah knowledge, it exists in abundance in the Jewish psyche. Torah insights inform the attitudes and practices of traditional Jews from the time we are born through our entire lives. Jewish law, however, must be decided by an expert in its application who knows all of its sources and understands how different circumstances affect the final ruling. Torah study and teaching are universal activities -- we recite the blessing every morning "to listen, learn and teach... all the teachings of Your Torah" (Sacks translation). But Torah ruling is only for the experts, not amateurs who know how to open a few books and think they thereby gain an understanding of Jewish law.

    That's how it's done in Authentic Judaism.


    Announcements #114: Teaneck Selichot Shiur with Rabbi Brovender

    Teaneck Selichot Shiur with Rabbi Brovender

    "To Forgive Is Divine"
    So Why Must We Ask It From Our Fellow Man?
    Pre-Selichot Shiur with Rabbi Chaim Brovender

    Cong. Keter Torah, 600 Roemer Avenue, Teaneck, NJ (click for directions)

    Saturday night, September 12th at 11:15 PM
    Followed by recitation of Selichot at Midnight

    Join Rabbi Brovender in Teaneck as we usher in the Teshuva season on the first night of Selichot.

    Sign up for WebYeshiva's free Elul Zman, with over 30 ongoing courses (live, interactive, online shiurim) to prepare for the High Holy Days.




    (Announce your simchah or Torah lectures by clicking on the button in the top right corner of Hirhurim. See here for readership statistics and here for instructions on buying an announcement.)


    Kedusha....Feet Together Until?

    By: Rabbi Ari Enkin

    The Shulchan Aruch rules that "it is proper for one to have his feet together when reciting the kedusha with the chazzan".[1] Indeed, it is universal custom to rise and stand with one's feet together whenever one hears the kedusha being recited. This has become so embedded in our synagogue conduct and decorum that it has virtually become a requirement.[2] The Arizal was especially careful to ensure that his feet were together when reciting the kedusha.[3] The origin of this practice is in order to imitate the angels whose legs and feet appear as one.[4] Although we stand in this position when reciting the shemone esrei and the kaddish, it is especially appropriate for kedusha because it is the prayer in which we praise God just as the angels do.[5] The question, however, is until when does the requirement to keep one's feet together remain in effect? As we will see, some individuals keep their feet together until after reciting "Yimloch" while others do so until having answered "Amen" to "Ha'el Hakadosh".

    Click here for moreThe Eliyahu Rabba insists that the requirement to keep one's feet together during kedusha is in effect until having answered "Amen" to "Ha'el Hakadosh".[6] It seems that this position was adopted by most halachic authorities.[7] This is also the position of Rabbi Shmuel Wosner who explains the rationale and importance of standing with one's feet together until after the conclusion of "Ha'el Hakadosh":

    "Regarding your question on the source for keeping one's feet together until after Ha'el Hakadosh…When one responds "Amen"' to a blessing it comes to include everything that was mentioned in the course of the blessing [and leading to its conclusion]…In this case the "Amen" of "Ha'el Hakadosh" comes to include the entire kedusha and is, in fact, the conclusion of the kedusha. This is especially true for congregations who have the custom to conclude the kedusha with "L'dor Vador"[8]

    It is also important to note that one is permitted to answer "Amen" to "Ha'el Hakadosh" during those parts of the service in which one is ordinarily forbidden to interrupt, even for congregational responses. One of the only exceptions to this rule is the kedusha, and given that the "Amen" to "Ha'el Hakadosh" is permitted as well, we can infer that its status is equal to that of kedusha![9]

    Nevertheless, those who choose to separate their legs after having recited "Yimloch" are entitled to do so and have authorities upon whom to rely. However, those who choose to conduct themselves stringently and wait until responding "Amen" at the conclusion of kedusha "will be blessed".[10] According to this approach, the "Ha'el Hakadosh" blessing is not truly a component of the kedusha. It was reportedly the practice of Rabbi Aharon Kotler to separate his legs once having responded "Yimloch" in kedusha.[11] There is additional room to be lenient on the High Holidays, when there is a considerable delay between "Yimloch" and "Ha'el Hakadosh" due to the added holiday insertions and accompanying singing. This is especially true since the supplementary kedusha insertions only begin after one has said "Ukdoshim Bechol Yom Yehalelucha Sela" which is essentially the conclusion of kedusha all year long, in any case.[12]

    This, my friends, is AUTHENTIC JUDAISM. ;-)


    ***************************************************************


    [1] O.C. 95:4, 125:2
    [2] Minhag Yisrael Torah O.C. 95:5
    [3] Magen Avraham 125:3
    [4] Berachot 10b. See Tur and Beit Yosef O.C. 95 for more reasons
    [5] Terumat Hadeshen 28
    [6] Eliyahu Rabba 95:7
    [7] Shulchan Aruch Harav 125:2, Aruch Hashulchan O.C. 95:5, Darchei Chaim V'shalom 178, Kaf Hachaim (Palagi) 15:58, Rivevot Ephraim 2:48:92
    [8] Shevet Halevi 3:15:6
    [9] Rema O.C. 66:3
    [10] Piskei Teshuvot 125:6
    [11] From "The Silver Era" by Rabbi Aharon Rakefet Rothkoff p.289-290. It is interesting to note that a student went up and rebuked Rabbi Kotler for having done so! Thanks to Rabbi Hillel Horovitz for this source!
    [12] Piskei Teshuvot 125:6, Rivevot Ephraim 2:48:92


    Monday, September 07, 2009

    Announcements #113: Pre Rosh Hashanah Yom Iyun

    Pre Rosh Hashana Yom Iyun - YCT and the Jewish Center

    Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbinical School and The Jewish Center Present

    A Yom Iyun – Day of Learning

    Date/Time:

    Sunday, September 13, 2009
    10:00am

    Location:
    The Jewish Center
    131 West 86 Street
    New York City

    Speakers include:
    Dr. Michelle Friedman
    Rabbi Nathaniel Helfgot
    Rabbi Ysoscher Katz
    Rabbi Dov Linzer

    This event is free and open to the public. Space is limited. For more information please go to www.yctorah.org

    Registration is required at www.jewishcenter.org




    (Announce your simchah or Torah lectures by clicking on the button in the top right corner of Hirhurim. See here for readership statistics and here for instructions on buying an announcement.)


    Sunday, September 06, 2009

    Sacred and Profane

    There is a great story in Yael Unterman's biography of Nehama Leibowitz, but it requires some background information. Rav Avraham Kook famously believed that everything had good to it and holiness in it, regardless of how evil it appears to us. He even found the positive in idolatry.

    In contrast, Prof. Yishayahu Leibowitz (Nehama's brother) took an extremely rationalist position on holiness. He believed that nothing is intrinsically holy and things become holy based on how they are used, not on what they are (similar to Prof. Menachem Kellner, in this post: link).

    With that in mind, this story about Prof. Avi Ravitzky -- who I have on good authority grew up attending the same synagogue as the much-older Prof. Leibowitz -- is from p. 548 of Nehama Leibowitz: Teacher and Bible Scholar:
    As an illustration, Professor Aviezer Ravitzky tells of the time he remarked to Yeshayahu, "I wonder how R. Kook made havdalah, how he could say that sentence, 'He who makes a distinction betwee the holy and the mundane."" Yeshayahu smiled, but prematurely, for Ravitzky then continued, "In your case, of course, it is difficult to understand how you can make Kiddush and say, 'He who makes Israel and the seasons holy'!"


    Filter Your Internet

    A caring member of the Baltimore community sent me a heartfelt letter that he had circulated to the rabbis in his community, asking me to post it. I've decided not to, because it makes me uncomfortable. I'm not a very pastoral kind of guy and I don't deal well with other people's personal problems.

    However, I will make the point that everyone should feel obligated to filter your internet. It's easy, free and just basic common sense. It will create a barrier to inappropriate websites, that even if penetrable it will take forethought and a conscious decision to go around.

    This is for adults and not just children, but if you have child and you allow them online, you are being negligent if you don't take some basic precautions. A free filter can be obtained here: link. Will this solve all of the problems on the internet? No. But it will partially solve many of them.

    Another website which readers might find useful is GuardYourEyes.org.

    In short, stay away from shmutz and do what you can to keep your kids away from it also.


    Thursday, September 03, 2009

    Announcements #112

    Two Shiurim in Queens

    THE VAAD L'CHIZUK HATORAH Is Pleased to Present the Following Shiurim
    WHEN: Motzaei Shabbos Kodesh, September 12, 2009, 10:30 P.M.
    WHERE: Congregation Nachlas Yitzchak, 141-39 73rd Avenue, Queens
    By: RAV MORDECHAI WILLIG and RAV NOACH ISAAC OELBAUM




    (Announce your simchah or Torah lectures by clicking on the button in the top right corner of Hirhurim. See here for readership statistics and here for instructions on buying an announcement.)


    Bloom County Classics VI



    (Click on image to enlarge)


    Audio Roundup LVII

    by Joel Rich

    From the New York Times - 9/2/2009 - Eerily familiar:

    Ayatollah Khamenei said this week that the study of social sciences “promotes doubts and uncertainty.” He urged “ardent defenders of Islam” to review the human sciences that are taught in Iran’s universities and that he said “promote secularism,” according to Iranian news services.
    “Many of the humanities and liberal arts are based on philosophies whose foundations are materialism and disbelief in godly and Islamic teachings,” Ayatollah Khamenei said at a gathering of university students and professors on Sunday, according to IRNA, the state news agency. Teaching those “sciences leads to the loss of belief in godly and Islamic knowledge.”
    For years, the study of subjects like philosophy and sociology has been viewed suspiciously by Iranian conservatives. During the earliest days of the Islamic Revolution, the nation’s leaders closed universities and tried to sanitize curriculums to fit their Islamic revolutionary ideology. The efforts ultimately failed under the weight of more pragmatic forces eager to engage with Western economies, and a student population hungry for contemporary ideas and contact with the West.

    Click here for more
  • Rabbi A Mintz - Secular Messianism of Nineteenth Century Enlightenment: link

    A must listen. Mendelson’s time period and messianism. Listen to the response to Van Dome (sp?) – does it apply to us today (where do our loyalties lie?).
    R’MM – Jewish messianism is not anti-nationalistic because either we believe it but don’t think we can affect it or we just pay lip service!!! (As my friend counselor K taught me – “Oy,Tata Zisa”)
    Universalistic messiah was not limited to reform! Fascinating tshuva concerning contributions to church building fund.

  • Rabbi Hershel Reichman - Atonement of the Individual vs. Atonement of the Community: link

    You had me at, “The Rav”! Yom Kippur sacrifice as a sacrifice of the Tzibbur = that of Knesset Yisrael which is greater than the sum of the individuals in the tzibbur, it is a single entity through time and space.

  • Rabbi A Weiss - Shofar: link

    Rambam – mitzvah is to hear the shofar
    Rabbeinu Tam – mitzvah is to blow the shofar
    R’Weiss’s reconciliation – they agree the “maaseh” (act) is blowing and mahuut (kiyum?) is hearing, question is which is main element for blessing.
    Some good mussar which could be summed up as don’t be people who are “hearing without listening”.

  • Rabbi Ally Ehrman -Shoftim: Gaiva - The Root Of All Evil: link

    Don’t be haughty – it’s usually due to low self esteem. (Rich Family Crest – Al Yithalel chacham bechochmato…Ki im bezot yithalel hamithalel haskel veyadoa oti-- Rough translation- Don't be proud about what I gave you but what you do with it).

  • Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz -Kavanah B'tefilah - Part 2: link

    Be humble in prayer - nothing “is coming to you” (someone please explain to me those whose misheberach text is “because ploni commanded to bless them” or “because we pray for them"). This explains how we stand during tfilla (R’Aryeh – women with feet together – how about the possibility that the minhag is ancient and the reasons are reverse engineering? Please discuss possibly reverse engineered reasons as a basis for psak).
    Famous R’Chaim on 2 types of Kavanah (me – affectation when Shatz says first bracha more slowly than others?).

  • Rabbi A Klapper - What is the Purpose of Animal Sacrifice?: link

    An interesting, if over my head, analysis of a possible approach to animal sacrifice. Starts with the Talmudic story concerning the banishment of the desire for idol worship. This banishment included a trade off - causing sacrifices to be less meaningful to us.
    Rambam explains the institution of animal sacrifice as a method to wean us away from idol worship. This could mean there is a universal impulse for this type of action which is being channeled to the worship HKB”H. Idol worship looks to achieve transcendence through peak physical (e.g. violence) experience, we seek to ritualize.

  • Rabbi A Kahn - Kaddish: link

    An introduction to the sources and how practices have changed over time (me – so you mean everyone saying their own kaddish may not have evolved as a mass kiddush hashem?).

  • Rabbi A Kahn - Kaddish for Women: link

    Review of famous case in Amsterdam and response of the Chavot Yair. Worthwhile thinking about how “traditions” start in response to local needs if there is no obvious prohibition.

  • R’Frand
    There seem to be a series of these available on www.613.org. I used to have a friend (hard to believe, I know) who purchased these and lent them out. IIRC the format was a halachic subject followed by mussar. Here it seems they’ve posted the mussar portions of some of his classes.

  • Rabbi Y Frand - Parshas Breishis: link

    Why a 2-step process for man’s creation – 1st life, then ability to talk? We aren’t created complete but need development, thus experience counts (me – most people with experience seem to agree on this point J). We must consult gedolim with experience.

  • Rabbi Y Frand - Parshas Achari Mos Kedoshim: link

    Mussar on responsibilities to family and community. Use “greatness of man” rather than “lowliness of man” when giving kids mussar. Story of Chofetz chalm crying and saying “Shabbos, Shabbos” as best mussar. [me – general rules are generally interesting, specific application varies by individual; and by individual by time and place – i.e. keep a lot of tools in your toolbox and think carefully about which to use and when]

  • Rabbi Y Frand - Parshas Bechukotai: link

    Bringers of Shalom (peace) will see messiah – we suffer from lack of these folks even within orthodox community (interesting – doesn’t categorize M.O. as in or out of this group).
    Ramban as a zionist propagandist! R’Frand as a clost Tzioni – recognizing Hashgacha’s role in 1948? (hmmm – I guess he hadn’t gotten the memo yet, or maybe I didn’t get the update).

  • R’ Kook: link

    Nicely done history of “The Rav” (as called by R’SZ Auerbach!).

  • Rabbi A Mintz - The Messianism of Bar Kokhba: link

    Focus on Messianism may be a reaction to troubles (exile). Interesting, the only non-torah articulated value in Maimonidies 13 principals is messianism.
    Rabbi Akiva introduced concept of a messianic mission distinct from a messianic person (Bar Kochba).
    Original Muslims were not temple-centric nor messiah-centric. Shia were persecuted and do have messiah focus.
    Discusses Rambam’s writings on topic.

  • Rabbi Aryeh Klapper - Halachic Man: link

    Very philosophical stuff! Halacha isn’t reflected by reality, it’s applied to reality – like math there’s an “ideal” world and we see to what degree reality approximates the ideal (actual psak is not a major issue).
    Metaphor of people who only can see shadows thinking they represent reality.

  • Rabbi A Weiss - Mitzva Categories: link

    Different levels of Torah commandments (e.g. specifically written in torah vs. derived). Includes my favorite R’Weiss category “Ratzon Hatorah” (the Torah’s will) which is based on torah’s laws or stories. Includes some Elul mussar as well.

  • Rabbi Eli Belizon - Baal Tosef and Baal Tigra Rosh Hashana That falls on Shabbos: link

    Why isn’t blowing 100 sounds on Rosh Hashana B’aal Tosif (adding on)? Why isn’t not blowing shofar on Shabbat B’aal Tigra (subtracting)?

  • Rabbi Aryeh Klapper - Learning Torah is Like Taking a Deadly Poison: link

    link
    Reconciling seemingly contradictory gemaras concerning “Lo Lishma” – the propriety of actions done for initially improper reasons. Defining Lshma – “proper” reasons. Categorization methodologies of Brisk and Baalei Tosfot (not considered – maybe the Talmudic authorities actually differed on these points?).

  • Rabbi Asher Weiss - Yom Kippur: link

    Yom Kippur – detailed analysis of eating and drinking prohibitions plus a dose of mussar.

  • Rabbi Elli Fischer - Ezra-Chapter 1 How could you not love someone who summarizes the story line in chapter 1 as: Get Back to Where You Once Belonged

    1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

    New OU Nach podcast series. Closer to R’Leibtag than R’Reisman! Interesting insights into Cyrus’s repatriation policies and religious beliefs (not quite monotheistic, more like “I’m gonna use every trick in the book…. I’m gonna make you love me” – The Temptations).
    2-Lists of who came back to Israel (not a lot) and where (fairly small territory).
    3-Begin to rebuild Beit Hamikdash; the Mizbeach was first. Viewed as continuation of 1st Beit Hamikdash but could not complete on a grand scale. Scene of those who had seen the first bayit crying while those who hadn’t were thrilled (me – see Horiyot 6a for a strange bit of demographics).
    4-Construction on hold till year 2 of Daryavosh.
    5 – need to prove permission to rebuild
    6 – documentation confirmed & expanded
    7 – Ezra appears – official backing of Persians for his interpretations
    8 – Resources arrive
    9 – Quakers (Chareidim) appear – intermarriage – Bad?

  • Wednesday, September 02, 2009

    Parashah Roundup: Ki Savo 5769

    by Steve Brizel

    Havas Bikurim, Mikra Bikurim and Vidui Maasros
  • R Yitzchak Etshalom provides an overview as to Havas Bikurim, Mikra Bikurim and Vidui Maasros: link
  • R Yissocher Frand , based on the Sforno, discusses the unique nature of Vidui Maasros and why we offer the first, as opposed to the best offerings: link
  • The Nesivos Shalom, as explicated by R Yitzchak Adlerstein, explains why Bikurim is a paradigm for the Yamim Noraim: link
  • R Ephraim Buchwald challenges us to look at the Mitzvah of Bikurim as a model for us to share in the happiness of others: link
  • R Asher Weiss discusses a Machlokes in Kiddushin 66b involving a Korban offered by a Kohen Ben Grushah or Ben Chalutzah ( i.e. Kohen Chalal): link (audio)
  • R Yonasan Sacks discusses a Machlokes Rishonim whether Hafrashah and Havaah are one or two mitzvos and the relationship between Sipur Yetzias Mitzrayim and Bikurim: link 1, link 2, link 3
  • R Baruch Simon explains why Bikurim is a Tikun for the Sin of the Spies: link (audio)

  • Click here for moreBirchas HaMitzvos
  • R Dovid Gottlieb examines when and why a Bircas HaMitzvah is necessary: link (audio)

  • Reward for Mitzvos and the Sanctity and Power of the Jewish Nation
  • R Avigdor Nevenzal discusses reward for Mitzvos and the unique nature of the Jewish Nation: link 1, link 2

  • The Tochacha
  • R Berel Wein reminds us that the ultimate message of the Tochacha is that the Jewish People will survive, no matter how severe their spiritual and physical challenges: link
  • R Sir Jonathan Sacks explores numerous views of the understanding of and hashkafic approaches to the Tochacha and its consequences: link
  • R Shlomoh Riskin investigates the nature of and how one attains being in a state of Simchah: link
  • R Asher Brander reminds us that we live in a generation that where one may be physically in the daytime and still feel blinded, confused, and without direction and purpose: link
  • R Avraham Gordimer investigates the disparities between the Tochacha in Bchukosai and the Tochacha in this week's Parsha: link

  • Shoshim Yom Department
  • Rav Soloveitchik ZTL, discusses Selichos, and Halachic and Hashkafic aspects of Rosh HaShanah: link (audio)
  • R David Brofsky discusses Hilcos Yom HaKippurim and many aspects of Kol Nidre: link
  • R Dr. Avraham Twersky reminds us that we must combine Yiras Shmayim with Shmiras HaMitzvoslink
  • R Herschel Schachter discusses Rosh HaShanah that occurs on Shabbos ,Tekios D'Meyushav and Tekios D'Meumad, and the two themes of Rosh HaShanah, and Nusach HaTefilah on Yom Tov: link 1 (audio), link 2 (audio), link 3 (audio), link 4 (audio)
  • R Elyakim Koenigsberg discusses Halachos of Selichos and Erev Rosh HaShanah: link (audio)
  • R Zvi Sobolofsy discusses the halachic and hashkafic aspects of Tekias Shofar and Tefilah: link (audio)
  • R Daniel Feldman discusses Simcha on Rosh HaShanah and Yom HaKippurim: link (audio)
  • R Baruch Simon discusses many halachos and hashkafic insights into the Halacha of Tekios Al Seder HaBrachos in the Musaf of Rosh HaShanah: link (audio)
  • R Eli Baruch Shulman investigates the various Shitos HaRishonim with respect to Shevarim Teruah Bneshima Achas: link (audio)
  • R Avraham Gordimer elaborates upon selected Minhagim of Rosh HaShanah: link

  • Last year's roundup: link


    Revealed Methodologies, Hidden Approaches

    I first heard the name Hayyim Angel early in my undergraduate career at Yeshiva College. I must have been a freshman or sophomore when I saw an article of his in Hamevaser, the Jewish studies periodical, that struck me. He wrote about women studying Talmud. He informed readers that, despite their potential surprise, there are still people who object to women studying Talmud and he proceeded to explain why they held that view and where he disagrees with it. I was surprised by two things. First, that there are Orthodox Jews who do not know that other Orthodox Jews object to women studying Talmud. I thought this was obvious but learned that Angel was correct. And second, the respect which he gave to the opinion he was opposing. To me, that showed fine character and a remarkable moderation.

    The author of that article is now known as Rabbi Hayyim Angel, an extremely popular Bible professor and the rabbi of a large and storied synagogue in Manhattan. He recently published his second book -- Revealed Texts, Hidden Meanings: Finding the Religious Significance in Tanakh -- and I would like to take this opportunity to offer some general thoughts on his approach and challenge a reader to compose a more detailed analysis, which is beyond my abilities.

    Click here for moreRabbi Angel's first book was Through an Opaque Lens. It, and the most recent book, contain collected essays by R. Angel about the Bible, some previously published in various journals but many new. Both books have two general types of essays -- methodological studies and textual studies.

    My initial instinct is to suggest that the methodological studies are the most important but I've come to believe that this isn't the case. However, I still think that they are the most interesting essays. Over the two books, R. Angel reviews the works of major Bible scholars in what has been called "The New School" of Orthodox Bible study -- including Dr. Nehama Leibowitz, R. Yoel Bin-Nun, R. Mordechai Breuer and R. Elhanan Samet. He also critiques a study by R. Mosheh Lichtenstein -- a prominent critic of "The New School" and discusses major themes in Maimonides' approach to the Bible that are relevant to "The New School".

    These essays alone are worth the price of the books. They introduce readers to these innovative scholars and describe in detail their approaches, offering multiple examples. I see too many people focusing on R. Mordechai Breuer and painting the entire "New School" with his somewhat extreme and idiosyncratic ideas. R. Angel's essays do much to alleviate this misunderstanding.

    R. Angel's textual studies span the entire Bible, from Genesis to Chronicles. He addresses books in the Pentateuch, Early Prophets, Later Prophets and Writings, often comparing different books and finding important ideas exposed by these comparisons. Particularly interesting is his multiple studies of the scrolls Jonah, Ruth and Esther.

    R. Angel is primarily a teacher (and from what I've been told, one of the best). As pointed out by R. Shalom Carmy in his preface to the second volume, R. Angel's textual studies are not just commentaries but detailed explanations of how he thinks about the texts. He shows readers how to go about studying the Bible -- what questions to ask and how to go about resolving them. The studies in these books tie back to the methodological studies, in that R. Angel reveals his own unique approach to the texts.

    What is his methodology? This is where I have to leave off. I lack the tools to effectively study his approach. In a public eulogy for R. Joseph B. Soloveitchik, his son Dr. Haym Soloveitchik pointed out that the only person qualified to eulogize R. Soloveitchik was R. Soloveitchik. Similarly, jJust like R. Angel writes in such an informative way about the methodology of other scholars, we need someone to read these essays carefully and extract his methodology. There is plenty of material from which to conduct such a study.

    One thing I can say, though, is that the character traits I detected in the first of article of his that I read many years ago as an undergraduate are a significant element of his methodology. R. Angel is cautious and moderate -- in his soft use of language, the respect he shows to people with whom he disagrees, his careful study of the texts, and the care with which he discusses the potential flaws of biblical characters. While he sometimes uses non-traditional approaches, the care he takes to be respectful and his considered avoidance of unnecessary controversy give his studies a sense of unfettered honest and make them always very informative.

    I was once riding the subway, reading the YCT Tanakh Companion to the Book of Samuel. I was going through R. Angel's article, published in his first book, titled "Why Didn't He Do It? An Analysis of Why David Did Not Kill Shaul". The yarmulka-wearing guy sitting next to me looked over my shoulder and asked what the article concludes -- why didn't he do it? I gave him a brief summary of the article, at which point he started yelling at me that David and Shaul were both righteous and no one can criticize them. This taught me a few lessons, one of which is that my summary did not do R. Angel justice. He is so cautious and respectful that had he explained his position in his calm and studied voice to my subway neighbor, this gentleman would not have been able to object.


    Tuesday, September 01, 2009

    The Long Stay in Kadesh

    I. The Ambiguous Stay

    While the Jews are famous for wandering in the desert for forty years, the truth is that most of that time was spent camped, particularly in one place. It is traditionally assumed that the Jews camped at Kadesh Barnea for 18 or 19 of the 40 years. One of the verses indicating this is subject to a disputed explanation that I would like to examine.

    Deut. 1:46 -- "ותשבו בקדש ימים רבים כימים אשר ישבתם"

    The first phrase is clear -- "And you stayed/dwelt/lived in Kadesh many years", where "days" means "years" (see this post: link). The second phrase, however, is difficult to decipher. Translating word-for-word simply, it means "like the days that you lived/dwelt" but that is ambiguous. The Aramaic translations retain that ambiguity and render each Hebrew word into Aramaic without elaboration (Onkelos, Pseudo-Yonasan, Peshitta).

    Click here for moreII. The Iraqi Debate

    Generally speaking, any translation is a commentary because it requires determining the meaning of ambiguous words. And in order to be entirely clear, it also requires clarifying ambiguous phrases. R. Sa'adia Gaon's translation of the Bible into Arabic is, therefore, a source of commentary from him. R. Yosef Kafach composed a commentary adapted from the translation, showing where R. Sa'adia explained difficult words and phrases, and explaining what he intended. On the above verse, R. Sa'adia translated the second phrase as "approximately like the all of the other years you dwelt". In other words, the Jews stayed in Kadesh the same amount of time that they stayed in other places. This is a traditional explanation because it is in accord with the understanding of Seder Olam.

    R. Sa'adia's student in Baghdad who later moved to Spain, R. Donash Ibn Labrat, wrote a book criticizing many of R. Sa'adia's commentaries implicit in his translation (the book is available online - link - PDF). On this verse, R. Donash takes issue with R. Sa'adia (par. 34), calling it a "big mistake". The Jews had traveled for only a year until they reached Kadesh but stayed in Kadesh for 18 (or 19) years. That is hardly the equation implied by R. Sa'adia's translation. Rather, R. Donash translates the phrase as meaning "the years they spent there". In other words, the Jews stayed in Kadesh for many years, the time they spent there. The last phrase serves to emphasize the long span of time spent in one place.

    III. The French Connection

    This dispute was continued in France a century later. Rashi (without citing this previous debate) takes R. Sa'adia's side in this dispute and provides an answer to R. Donash's question. The Jews stayed in Kadesh for the amount of time spent outside of it afterward, not before. They spent 19 years in Kadesh, wandered the desert for 19 years, and then returned to Kadesh.

    Rashi's grandson, Rashbam, takes R. Donash's side (without explanation). He explains the second phrase as meaning "as you know" -- you know how long of a time you spent there. There is, therefore, no indication that it was directly equal to the amount of time spent elsewhere.

    IV. The Third Option

    Ibn Ezra has a radically different approach to understanding this phrase. He utilizes the connection between the Spies' sojourn into the Land of Israel and the amount of time spent in the desert, 40 years in the desert as a punishment for the 40 days in Israel (Num. 14:34). The phrase "like the days that you dwelt" refers, therefore, to the spies dwelling in the Land of Israel.

    Shadal rejects Ibn Ezra's approach because of two questions: 1) Why did they only stay an additional 38 years in the desert when the spies were in Israel for 40 days? 2) Why does it say that the spies dwelt in Israel when really they traveled through it? There is a further question that can be asked: 3) Why does the verse say that the Jews dwelt for that period of time when it was only the spies?

    In response to these questions, we can answer: 1) It was a show of God's mercy that he cut the punishment a little short (Ha-Kesav Ve-Ha-Kabbalah). 2) & 3) The verse speaks about the time that the entire nation waited while the spies traveled the Land (Ha-Kesav Ve-Ha-Kabbalah). Or 3) The spies were acting as the agents of the entire nation and it is as if they all traveled the Land for 40 days (Mendelssohn's Bi'ur).

    V. Modern Jewish Commentaries

    Mendelssohn's Bi'ur commentary quotes both the views of Rashbam (& R. Donash) and Ibn Ezra, and Shadal assumes he adopts the latter. However, in his German translation of the Torah, Mendelssohn follows Rashbam, or at least that is what Shadal claims. I don't understand the German but here it is: דיא איהר דאזעלבסט האבט פערוויילען מיססען.

    Shadal rejects Ibn Ezra and accepts Rashbam. R. David Tzvi Hoffmann offers both Rashi's and Rashbam's explanations. Hertz follows Rashbam. S.L. Gordon (Shelag) follows Rashbam and adds that Kadesh was the main encampment throughout the stay in the desert but the Jews journeyed from there many times. A.S. Hartom also accepts Rashbam, and writes that the Torah does not specify the amount of time because it is not important. Da'as Mikra quotes both Rashi and Rashbam in the text of the commentary, and Ibn Ezra in a footnote with an instruction to see Shadal's comments, which dispute Ibn Ezra's approach (as above).

    VI. Translations

    As mentioned above, the Aramaic translations rendered the phrase under discussion word for word, without explaining it. Nearly all of English translations follow Rashbam:

    KJV: So ye abode in Kadesh many days, according unto the days that ye abode there
    NIV: And so you stayed in Kadesh many days--all the time you spent there
    NRSV: After you had stayed at Kadesh as many days as you did
    Net Bible: Therefore, you remained at Kadesh for a long time – indeed, for the full time
    NAB: That is why you had to stay as long as you did at Kadesh
    JPS: So ye abode in Kadesh many days, according unto the days that ye abode there
    NJPS: Thus, you remained at Kadesh all that long time [fn: Lit. "many days, like the days that you remained"]
    Living Torah: You remained in Kadesh Barnea for a long time, as long as you remained [in all the other places]. (See footnote: link)

    Only R. Aryeh Kaplan's The Living Torah follows Rashi and R. Sa'adia Ga'on. The rest follow Rashbam and R. Donash. In the debate between R. Sa'adia and R. Donash, it seems that the student has prevailed.


    Elul......Selichot

    By: Rabbi Ari Enkin

    As the month of Elul enters it is customary to include in all written correspondences blessings for the upcoming New Year.[1] Some even begin to do so shortly after Tisha B'av.[2] The source for this custom derives from the meeting between Moshe and Yitro, his father in law. At that time the Torah tells us that “Each man inquired on the other’s welfare[3]”. The Hebrew initials of this verse make up the word “Elul” thereby offering a Scriptural hint for this beautiful custom. Some continue to write wishes for a good year until Yom Kippur,[4] while others do so right through to Hoshana Rabba, at which time the true “sealing” of our fate takes place.[5]

    Elul is also the month where elaborate prayers for penitence known as the “Selichot” prayers are recited.[6] Sefardim generally recite these prayers throughout the entire month of Elul,[7] while Ashkenazim do so commencing from the week[8] before Rosh Hashana is to arrive.[9] It is reported that the custom of the Arizal was like that of the Sefardim and he recited Selichot for the entire month of Elul.[10]

    Click here for moreThere are number of customs as to when the Selichot prayers can or should be recited. They are ideally to be recited during the last three hours of the night,[11] while others do so anytime after midnight.[12] Others recite Selichot before the crack of dawn[13] or even early each evening,[14] It is important to note that there are authorities who strongly oppose reciting Selichot before midnight under any circumstances.[15] Some suggest that if for whatever reason the Selichot cannot be recited during its ideal time, then they should be recited prior to Mincha each day.[16] Selichot should preferably never be said alone,[17] especially those parts written in Aramaic.[18] The basic form of the Selichot prayers was given to us by none other than God Himself.[19]

    It is interesting to note that the Selichot service is the only service outside of the standard order of daily prayers where the chazzan recites the “Titkabel” in the concluding Kaddish.[20] Indeed, the format of Selichot even resembles that of a Shacharit or Mincha service. For example the Selichot begins with "Ashrei" which corresponds to the Pesukei d'Zimra of Shacharit and of course, the Ashrei of Mincha. The body of the Selichot is compared to the “Shemoneh Esrei”. The “Tachanun” at the conclusion of Selichot mirrors the end of Mincha and the concluding prayers of Shacharit.

    Although some have the custom to fast on the first day that Selichot are recited though simply engaging in extra kindness and good deeds is considered superior to fasting.[21] In some communities, the one who leads the Selichot prayers takes priority over all others in leading the remaining prayer services throughout the day.[22] The Kaddish before and after the first Selichot of the year are recited is customarily chanted in the traditional High Holiday tune.[23]


    **************************************************

    [1] Be’er Heitev 581:10, Kaf Hachaim 581:18
    [2] Minhag Yisrael Torah 481:2
    [3] Shemot 18:7
    [4] Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 128:2
    [5] Mishna Berura 661:2
    [6] O.C. 581:1
    [7] O.C. 581:1
    [8] Kaf Hachaim 581:27-29. If there are less than four days in the week prior to Rosh Hashana then Selichot are further advanced by one additional week.
    [9] Rema O.C. 581:1
    [10] Kaf Hachaim 581:16
    [11] O.C. 581:1
    [12] Igrot Moshe 2:105
    [13] Mateh Ephraim 581:11
    [14] Igrot Moshe O.C. 2:105, O.C. 1:2
    [15] Kaf Hachaim 581:2, Pitchei Olam 581:1
    [16] Yechave Da'at 1:46
    [17] Rema O.C. 565:5
    [18] Mishna Berura 581:1, Kaf Hachaim 581:26
    [19] Rosh Hashana 17b;Ritva, Tanna D’vei Eliyahu Zuta 23, Kaf Hachaim 581:13,14
    [20] Mate Ephraim; Elef Hamagen 581:41
    [21] Kaf Hachaim 581:9
    [22] Rema O.C. 581:1, Kaf Hachaim 581:53. Those who disagree: Mateh Ephraim 581:31, Aruch Hashulchan 581:6, Binyan Shlomo 37
    [23] Ktzeh Hamateh 581:39


    Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Favorites More